Stanford Legal

9

Law touches most aspects of life. Here to help make sense of it is the Stanford Legal podcast, where we look at the cases, questions, conflicts, and legal stories that affect us all every day. Stanford Legal launched in 2017 as a radio show on Sirius XM. We’re now a standalone podcast and we’re back after taking some time away, so don’t forget to subscribe or follow this feed. That way you’ll have access to new episodes as soon as they’re available.We know that the law can be complicated. In past episodes we discussed a broad range of topics from the legal rights of someone in a conservatorship like Britney Spears to the Supreme Court’s abortion decision to how American law firms had to untangle their Russian businesses after the invasion of Ukraine. Past episodes are still available in our back catalog of episodes.In future shows, we’ll bring on experts to help make sense of things like machine learning and developments in the regulation of artificial intelligence, how the states draw voting maps, and ways that the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling will change college admissions.Our co-hosts know a bit about these topics because it’s their life’s work.Pam Karlan studies and teaches what is known as the “law of democracy,”—the law that regulates voting, elections, and the political process. She served as a commissioner on the California Fair Political Practices Commission, an assistant counsel and cooperating attorney for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and (twice) as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. She also co-directs Stanford’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, which represents real clients before the highest court in the country, working on important cases including representing Edith Windsor in the landmark marriage equality win and David Riley in a case where the Supreme Court held that the police generally can’t search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested unless they first get a warrant. She has argued before the Court nine times.And Rich Ford’s teaching and writing looks at the relationship between law and equality, cities and urban development, popular culture and everyday life. He teaches local government law, employment discrimination, and the often-misunderstood critical race theory. He studied with and advised governments around the world on questions of equality law, lectured at places like the Sorbonne in Paris on the relationship of law and popular culture, served as a commissioner for the San Francisco Housing Commission, and worked with cities on how to manage neighborhood change and volatile real estate markets. He writes about law and popular culture for lawyers, academics, and popular audiences. His latest book is Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History, a legal history of the rules and laws that influence what we wear.The law is personal for all of us—and pivotal. The landmark civil rights laws of the 1960s have made discrimination illegal but the consequences of the Jim Crow laws imposed after the civil war are still with us, reflected in racially segregated schools and neighborhoods and racial imbalances in our prisons and conflict between minority communities and police. Unequal gender roles and stereotypes still keep women from achieving equality in professional status and income. Laws barring gay people from marrying meant that millions lived lives of secrecy and shame. New technologies present new legal questions: should AI decide who gets hired or how long convicted criminals go to prison? What can we do about social media’s influence on our elections? Can Chat GPT get copyright in a novel?Law matters. We hope you’ll listen to new episodes that will drop on Thursdays every two weeks.To learn more, go to https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-legal-podcast/.

Recent Episodes
  • AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment
    May 15, 2025 – 00:39:31
  • The Trump Administration and the Rule of Law Under Pressure
    Apr 30, 2025 – 00:46:11
  • Trade Wars, Economic Chaos, and Law: Unpacking Trump's Trade Tactics with Alan Sykes
    Apr 16, 2025 – 00:32:52
  • Trump’s Forced Deportations to El Salvador Prisons, Detentions, and Fear on College Campuses
    Mar 28, 2025 – 00:33:43
  • Accountability in Government: Glenn Fine on the Crucial Role of Inspectors General, the Government's Watchdogs
    Mar 20, 2025 – 00:28:18
  • Gaza Conflict: Governance, Rebuilding, and Legal Challenges
    Mar 6, 2025 – 00:29:39
  • Suing DOGE: Musk, Trump, and an Imperial Presidency
    Feb 20, 2025 – 00:28:38
  • Trump's Pardons: Political Violence, Hate Groups, and the Rule of Law
    Feb 6, 2025 – 00:30:37
  • Criminal Justice in Divided America: Can Democracy Survive a Broken Justice System?
    Jan 23, 2025 – 00:30:57
  • Special Counsel Smith's Report on Trump's Interference in the 2020 Election
    Jan 15, 2025 – 00:30:04
  • California Burning: LA Fires, Climate Change, and Insurance Nightmares with Environmental Lawyer Debbie Sivas
    Jan 10, 2025 – 00:29:43
  • Tariffs, Trade Wars, and Policy Shifts under Trump: A Tutorial on the Global Economy and Trade
    Dec 19, 2024 – 00:29:01
  • The Presidential Pardon Power, from Biden and Trump to Ancient Kings
    Dec 6, 2024 – 00:26:20
  • Exploring AI in Healthcare: Legal, Regulatory, and Safety Challenges
    Nov 21, 2024 – 00:48:19
  • Crime, the Opioid Crisis, and Gun Violence: New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin on How Action at the State Level Is Making a Difference
    Nov 7, 2024 – 00:47:58
  • Racism in Property Deeds: Stanford Team Develops AI Tool to Identify and Map Racial Covenants
    Oct 24, 2024 – 00:30:00
  • Killing in Self Defense: The Legal Complexities of Abuse-Related Crimes and the Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Women's Criminal Convictions
    Oct 10, 2024 – 00:29:59
  • Challenging Originalism: Putting the Electoral College, Presidential Immunity, and Recent SCOTUS Decisions into Historical Context
    Sep 26, 2024 – 00:32:15
  • Election Stress Test: Can America's Electoral System Weather 2024?
    Sep 12, 2024 – 00:26:52
  • High Court, High Stakes: The Massive Weight of Recent Supreme Court Rulings
    Aug 29, 2024 – 00:39:51
  • How Lawyers Can Undermine Russian Sanctions and Ukraine War Effort
    Aug 15, 2024 – 00:27:37
  • The Future of Environmental Regulation Following SCOTUS’ Overruling of the Chevron Doctrine
    Aug 1, 2024 – 00:27:54
  • David Sklansky on Judge Cannon's Controversial Case Dismissal and Trump's Legal Battles
    Jul 18, 2024 – 00:34:32
  • Jennifer Chacón Discusses the Failures of U.S. Immigration Policy and How the Law is Developing
    Jul 4, 2024 – 00:28:20
  • Former Federal Judge Michael McConnell Discusses Presidential Immunity and Trump Cases with Pam Karlan
    Jun 20, 2024 – 00:31:30
  • Justice for All? Why We Have an Access to Justice Gap in America—And What to Do About It
    Jun 6, 2024 – 00:34:57
  • The Legacy of Brown v. BOE: Success or Failure?
    May 23, 2024 – 00:31:29
  • Stanford's David Sklansky on Trump's Many Trials
    May 9, 2024 – 00:27:42
  • AI in Government and Governing AI: A Discussion with Stanford’s RegLab
    Apr 25, 2024 – 00:32:07
  • Representing Clients at the Supreme Court
    Apr 11, 2024 – 00:37:14
  • "Beware Euphoria: Unraveling America's Drug War"
    Mar 28, 2024 – 00:30:43
  • Bill Gould on Dartmouth Basketball and the Changing Game of Unions and College Athletics
    Mar 14, 2024 – 00:33:16
  • Are Frozen Embryos Children? A Discussion of the Alabama Decision on Embryo Rights and the Future of IVF Pregnancies in the US
    Feb 29, 2024 – 00:34:37
  • Tackling Mass Incarceration in the US
    Feb 15, 2024 – 00:30:01
  • The Constitution, Trump, and the Struggles of US Courts to Interpret History with Jack Rakove
    Feb 1, 2024 – 00:25:47
  • Droughts, Failing Infrastructure, and Water
    Jan 18, 2024 – 00:28:04
  • Does Inequity in U.S. Patent Inventorship Matter? A Discussion on Inequality in the Patent System and how it Impacts Innovation
    Jan 4, 2024 – 00:21:37
  • Texas Abortion Restrictions, Medicated Abortions, and Reproduction Rights in a Post-Roe US
    Dec 21, 2023 – 00:30:23
  • Mass Shootings and Guns: Examining the Court’s Interpretation of the Right to Bear Arms and the Consequences of Gun Laws in the US
    Dec 7, 2023 – 00:28:53
  • From Sumptuary Laws to Senate Suits: Dress Codes in History and Today
    Nov 23, 2023 – 00:27:37
  • Stanford Legal Podcast Trailer: Law Matters, we're here to help make sense of it
    Nov 13, 2023 – 00:03:49
  • Expert Insights on Trump Indictments from David Sklansky
    Nov 9, 2023 – 00:28:17
  • This Thursday: Stanford Legal Returns with Expert Insights on Trump Indictments from David Sklansky
    Nov 6, 2023 – 00:01:41
  • Stanford Legal is Back: Law Matters, we're here to help make sense of it
    Nov 2, 2023 – 00:03:49
  • Mishandling of Top-Secret Government Documents and the Mounting Legal Challenges Facing Donald J. Trump with David Sklansky
    Aug 29, 2022 – 00:36:40
  • The Fight to Save the Town: Reimagining Discarded America with Michelle Wilde Anderson
    Aug 15, 2022 – 00:27:55
  • The New Supreme Court and Its Blockbuster Term with Pamela Karlan
    Aug 15, 2022 – 00:28:04
  • What have we learned so far from the January 6 hearings, with Robert Weisberg
    Aug 1, 2022 – 00:27:59
  • Lost, Not Stolen: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election with Michael McConnell
    Aug 1, 2022 – 00:28:02
  • Money, Guns, and Lawyers: The Uniquely American Epidemic of Mass Shootings
    Jun 20, 2022 – 00:27:26
Recent Reviews
  • Forever_Eagle
    Just right for me!
    The conversations are though provoking and the topics are oh-so relevant.
  • midwestBlue
    3.28.25
    once again a guest is trying to sane wah trump’s reasoning for breaking the law: she says it is either defiance or sloppiness. do any of you understand trump from all the years you have had to watch him. trump is a criminal, if there is a short cut to doing anything and the reward of it lands in his lap he doesn’t care if the act to get him there is legal, a rule, a norm, etc.! where do you think negotiation money would go, back to the gov & trump not getting any slipped into some dark shadow account? dark shadow monetary accounts are trump’s middle names.
  • cbechte
    On point and entertaining!
    I love these deep dives with some of the world’s best legal thinkers!. Topical and interesting!
  • RogerThat
    Amateur Hour
    Was hoping for something intelligent and insightful. Instead a lot of “ums” and “uhs” and highly disengaging conversations. Someone please… give these guys some professional direction.
  • Domoreresearch
    Theranos
    Weak. Rehashing old news. Lots of misspeaking.
  • Rachelhstar
    It’s Elizabeth Holmes
    Not Emily Holmes ;)
  • Qlex
    Get her name right
    Podcasting 101 - Get the name tight. At the ver beginning of the show, one of the call her…Emily! So bad
  • CJCJ4242
    Wow!
    I get to hear a Bankman lecture again? Sign me up. I haven’t even downloaded this yet but it’s definitely five stars.
  • jas19890x
    Too superficial
    Contents of some discussions are simply too superficial....I didn’t learn much after hearing for half an hour
  • Blink&Capture
    Great show!
    Joe and Pam are great hosts! They have wonderful guests on the show and I learn something new every time I tune in.
  • Perez_ident
    Great series!
    Very informative and interesting take on current legal topics.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.